- Automobile Accidents
- Car Accident Claims
- Motorcycle Accidents
- Wrongful Death
- Pedestrian Accidents
- Train Accidents
- Aviation Accidents
- Bicycle Accidents
- Chain Accidents
- Rollover Accidents
- Boat Accidents
- Spinal Cord Injury
- Brain Injury
- Slip and Fall Injury
- Construction Accidents
- Burn Injury
- Animal Attacks
- Premises Liability
- Medical Malpractice
- Nursing Home Negligence
- Vehicle Accidents
- Auto Accidents
- Car Accidents
- Truck Accidents
- Bus Accidents
- Wrongful Death Claims
- Medical Malpractice Claims
- Brain Injury Claims
- Premise Liability Claims
- Product Liability Claims
- General Negligence
- Construction Liability
- Dog Bites
- Drowning Accidents
- Worker's Compensation Claims
Injuries in Accidents: Possible Legal Defenses
An accident injury lawyer specializes on injuries acquired by their clients whenever they met an unwanted event such as an accident. These accidents usually causes major injuries to persons who are directly involved in it. Drivers usually receive the full brunt of the most debilitating injuries in an accident due to their vulnerable positions.
Laws from different states are usually different when it comes to dealing with personal injury cases caused by accidents. Although it is practical to know one’s rights especially as a form of arming oneself against possible future accidents, it is also crucial to know the possible defenses that one might encounter, or use, when in a personal injury settlement/litigation dispute.
Comparative Negligence
Comparative negligence rests on the basic premise that not every accident can be focally blamed to only a single party. Multiple contributions can be made to meet the exact conditions for a fatal or highly damaging accident to occur.
Comparative negligence is usually used in many states as a form of balancing the amount of liability covered and subsequently burdened by the defendant. It casts a doubtful light to the victim’s credibility, making him/her a potential causative agent of the accident itself. If it is proven that the defendant’s liability is only 60%, then the remaining 40% is vested upon the victim in a settlement dispute.
Contributory Negligence
Contributory negligence rests also on the same premise as comparative negligence. However, the principle of contributory negligence is relatively crueler than comparative negligence with its provision which states that if any form of negligence which caused the accident is proven in the part of the victim, then the victim holds no right to claim damage claims.
This type of law is enacted in some states, while some usually prefer comparative negligence as a form of legal defense
Risk
It is also a usual defense for defendants to say that the victim already knew of the possible injuries he/she may acquire while participating in the activity. This type of defense is especially common in contact sports like football, basketball, etc.
Knowing how to deal with these defenses requires the expertise of an accident injury lawyer who knows how to get around these loopholes that may be exploited by the defendant.